“Yeughh, Sy, that whirling, the entire Universe spinning around me in every direction at once.”
“Well, you were at a point of spherical symmetry, Anne.”
“There’s that word ‘symmetry‘ again. Right side matches left side, what else is there to say?”
“A whole lot, especially after the mathematicians and physicists started playing with the basic notion.”
“Which is?”
“Being able to execute a transformation without making a relevant difference.”
“Relevant?”
“To the context. Swapping the king of spades for the king of hearts would be relevant in some card games but not others, right? If it doesn’t affect the play or the scoring, swapping those two when no‑one’s looking would be a legitimate symmetry operation. Spin a snowflake 60° and it looks the same unless you care exactly where each molecule is. That’s rotational symmetry, but there’s lots of geometric symmetry operations — reflections, inversions, glides, translations—”
“Translation is a symmetry operation?”
“In this connection, ‘translation‘ means movement or swapping between two different places in space. The idea came from crystals. Think of a 3D checkerboard, except the borderlines aren’t necessarily perpendicular. Perfect crystals are like that. Every cube‑ish cell contains essentially the same arrangement of atoms. In principle you could swap the contents of any two cells without making a difference in any of the crystal’s measurable properties. That’d be a translation symmetry operation.”
“Glides make me think of ice skating.”
“The glide operation makes me think of a chess knight’s move — a translation plus a reflection across the translation path. Think of wet footprints crossing a dry floor. That’s one example of combining operations to create additional symmetries. You can execute 48 unique symmetry operations on a cube even without the translation‑related ones. In my grad school’s crystallography class they taught us about point group and wallpaper and space group symmetries. It blew me away — beautiful in both mathematical and artistic senses. You’ve seen M C Escher’s art?”
“Of course, I love it. I pushed into his studio once to watch him work but he spotted me and shouted something Dutch at me. I’ve wondered what he thought when I pushed out of there.”
“His pieces drew heavily on geometric symmetries. So did Baroque art, music and architecture.”
“Music? Oh, yes — they had motifs and whole sections you could swap, and rhythm patterns and tunes you could read forwards and backwards like in a mirror… We’ve come a long way from snowflake symmetry, haven’t we?”
“We’re just getting started. Here’s where the Physics folks generalized the idea. Your unfortunate experience in space is right on the edge of what most people consider as symmetry. Were you impressed with the cube’s 48 operations?”
“I suppose. I haven’t had time to think about it.”
“A sphere has an infinite number. You could pick any of an infinite number of lines through its center. Each is an axis for an infinite number of rotational symmetries. Times two because there’s an inversion point at the center so the rotation could go in either direction. Then each line is embedded in an infinite number of reflection planes.”
“Goodness, no wonder I was dizzy. But it’s still geometry. What was the edge that the physicists went past?”
“The border between step‑at‑a‑time discrete symmetries and continuous ones. Rotate that snowflake 60° and you’ve got a match; anything not a multiple of 60° won’t pair things up. Across the border, some of the most important results in modern Physics depend on continuous symmetries.”
“How can you even have a continuous symmetry?”

“Here, I’ll draw a circle on this square of paper. I can rotate the square by 90, 180 or 270 degrees and everything’s just the way it was. But if the square’s not relevant because we’re only interested in the circle, then I can rotate the paper by any amount I like and it’s a no‑difference transformation, right?”
“Continuous like on an infinite line but it’s wrapped around.”
“Exactly, and your infinite line is another example — any translation along that line, by a mile or a millimeter, is a perfectly good symmetry operation.”
“Ooo, and time, too. I experience time as an infinite line.”
“So does everyone. but most only travel in one direction.”
~~ Rich Olcott
Hi Rich, much appreciated. I am trying to put my arms around the quantum mechanics’ particle entanglement and nothing is suppose to go faster than the speed of light. Please help.
Thanks, Bill Hyatt
Denver Chapter
LikeLike
Sorry ’bout this, Bill, but the quick answer is, you can’t. Einstein couldn’t and to my knowledge no-one can these days, either. This post https://hardscienceainthard.com/2021/08/30/the-pizza-connection/ is the best I can do to clarify the conditions. Non-locality goes against all the Physics we’ve built up since Newton, but it’s a pretty firmly established experimental fact. Kind of like gravity in Newton’s day — it took 250 years and an Einstein to figure that one out.
LikeLike