Category: Astronomy: Stellar Science

Neutronium Chill

On By rolcottIn Astronomy, Astronomy: Stellar Science, Crazy Theories, UncategorizedLeave a comment

<chirp, chirp> I recognize the caller’s number. “Afternoon, Walt. Weren’t you going to trash that phone?”

“Afternoon, Moire. I decided to keep it, just for you.”

“Aww.”

“Don’t get cute. My people have a follow-on question for you. The neutronium chunk that might or might not rearrange our Solar System — how much lead time do we have between when we detect it and when things go sour?”

“So many unknowns. The object’s size, its speed, what signal we’re monitoring, even what you mean by ‘go sour’.”

“Yes, yes, very uncertain. Make some assumptions.”

“Big assignment. I’ll start with size. The smallest neutron star we’ve ever seen is about 1.3 solar masses, but Oppenheimer’s calculations say smaller chunks could be stable. Suppose it’s near the theoretical minimum, say about a quarter of a solar mass, maybe 20‑25 kilometers in diameter.”

“A whole neutron star’s about that diameter. This chunk would be a small cast‑off.”

“No, the cast‑off could be wider than its parent. It’s only a fraction of the star’s mass, so there’d be less gravity squeezing its component particles together. Anyway, it’s a reasonable size for calculating the telescopic detection limit.”

“Walk me through that.”

“Sure. Our sharpest telescopes, the Hubble and the Webb, both use detectors that span about about 40 milliarcseconds per pixel‑width.”

” ‘Milli-‘ I get; that’s one one‑thousandth. ‘Arcseconds’?”

“Works like a clock. Sixty arcseconds to an arcminute, sixty arcminutes to a degree. While I’m at it, 360 degrees is full circle is 2π radians. Put it all together, one of those pixels covers about 0.2 microradian across the sky. Now visualize a triangle. One side spans the chunk; the angle opposite it is at Hubble’s detector.”

“A long, pointy triangle.”

“Pointy enough that the angle in radians is essentially equal to its sine and we can do trigonometry. Your question boils down to, how close does the chunk have to be so its light spans a Hubble pixel?” <keyboard clatter> “You’re not going to like this. A 20‑kilometer object casting a one‑pixel figure can’t be more than 180 million kilometers away. That’s already well inside the Solar System, closer to us than the Asteroid Belt. Just a one‑pixel ‘image,’ not a portrait, from our best telescope for visible light.”

“How about another part of the spectrum?”

“I wouldn’t bet on it. The chunk probably radiated X‑rays early on, but it’s had millions of years in interstellar space to cool off.”

“How is it millions? The Crab Nebula hosts a neutron star and its supernova looks pretty random to me. The Nebula could have flung a chunk at us and it’s only 6500 lightyears away.”

“The fastest interstellar traveler we’ve seen so far is 3I/Atlas, got here from who knows where with a base velocity of 58 kilometers per second. I’ll give you a factor of two — say the Crab flung your chunk at 120 km/sec. That’s still 2500 times slower than lightspeed. At that rate it’d take 16 million years to arrive here. The Crab supernova’s light got here only 970‑some years ago so no chance for an IR‑bright Crab chunk any time soon.”

“Neutrinos?”

“The IceCube Neutrino Observatory detects a million cosmic‑ray muons for every neutrino it sees. Tough odds.”

“Telescopic surveillance isn’t an option. Observing neutrinos is a crapshoot. How about gravitational messing with planet orbits?”

“Something subtler would appear first. Imagine a spherical shell where the inward pull of the Sun’s gravity just equals the outward pull of everything outside.”

“That’d be the outer edge of the Oort Cloud.”

Data from
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_long-period_comets

“Pretty much. The chunk will carry its own gravity sphere. Where the two spheres intersect, the opposing gravity fields fight. Some Oort objects fly outward, many drop inward to become long‑period comets. The chunk‑detection signal would be a drastic rise in long‑period comet sightings. Typical long‑period comets take hundreds of years to get down to where we can see them. Nonetheless, we’ve had an upward spike recently.”

“Because of improved technology?”

“Or improved financing. Congress is interested in finding Earth‑threatening asteroids. Look for asteroids, maybe find comets.”

“Lead time in centuries, opening bell may have rung. Bye”

Author’s conception of a neutronium fragment
being expelled from the Crab Nebula.

~ Rich Olcott

A Three Burdens Story

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, Crazy Theories, Physics: Quantum Mechanics, UncategorizedLeave a comment

<bzzzt, bzzzt> “Who is this and how did you get this number?”

“Morning, Walt. It’s Sy Moire. Does hitting ‘Reply’ to your entry on my phone log count as spycraft?”

“Drat, another burner phone to trash. Oh well. Why the call?”

“Some history for your neutronium question, may make a difference.”

“Good difference or bad difference?”

“Depends on how you slant it, I suppose. The good news is that detecting that Earth‑threatening lump of neutronium would be easier than I thought. The bad news is that detecting it would be easier than I thought.”

“Forward and backward in the same statement. Unravel that.”

“It all goes back to Oppenheimer—”

“J Robert, the guy who ran the Manhattan Project?”

“The same, except before that he did theoretical Physics, not project management. Probably the most prominent physicist of the 1930s. He was active and influential in everything from molecular quantum mechanics and quantum field theory to astrophysics. He knew pretty much everyone who counted; everyone else knew of him. That made him a natural choice as a recruiter for the Project. I think many people were surprised when he turned out to be a good administrator.”

“Good for him and us. Why drag him into this?”

“He showed how neutron stars and black holes could happen. We’d known since 1915 that black holes were implicit in Einstein’s equations. Einstein himself didn’t think the Universe would allow matter to be that dense. In 1939 Oppenheimer showed how a star’s collapse could compress matter enough for the job. Actually, black holes were the easy part.”

“How could that be easy?”

“A star’s outer layers are supported by thermal pressure from the gas inside, right? When there’s not enough fuel to supply the heat, those outer layers come smashing inward like a roof when you knock out a load‑bearing wall. A big‑enough star would have plenty of gravitational potential energy to crush its core into black‑hole mode. Oppenheimer’s real challenge was explaining why the fall stopped partway for a smaller star. He used a tip from Fermi.”

“Enrico Fermi, the guy who built the nuclear reactor under the football field?”

“The same, except it wasn’t under the field, it was under the bleacher seats, but that’s another story. Anyway, Fermi had applied Pauli’s exclusion principle—”

“Out from the weeds, please.”

“Sorry. A couple of years prior, Fermi had worked out how a gas of quantum particles would behave under compression.”

“We’re talking electron or neutron gases?”

“Those among others. Squeeze a sparse quantum gas and measure the pressure it exerts at each decrease in volume. Pressure times volume is energy. For normal gases, pressure change times volume change at constant temperature is essentially constant. With quantum gases there’s a quantum‑limit pressure where the ΔP×ΔV energy goes nuts regardless of temperature. You need to input drastic amounts of energy to achieve even a small volume decrease. Technically, the limit’s called degeneracy pressure but I’d avoid that term in your report.”

“Because negative electron repels negative electron, naturally.”

“Nope, this is completely quantum, nothing to do with charge. It applies to neutrons just like it does to electrons although the limits are different. Try to cram too many quantum particles into a given volume and something has to give.”

“I see where you’re going. Does that energy limit depend on particle mass?”

“Indeed. Heavier particles have a higher limit.”

“Let me guess. White dwarf stars collapse to the electron limit, neutron stars to the neutron limit, pressure crushing beyond that makes a black hole. That’s what Oppenheimer calculated?”

“Mm‑hm. Better yet, he calculated minimum mass for each object type. That’s where the good‑news/bad‑news comes in. You need a lot of gravitational pressure to maintain a stable neutronium object. Below about a tenth of a solar mass, BLOOEY! If your nasty nova were to fling a too‑small chunk of neutronium at us, the chunk would disintegrate long before it could get this far.”

“So the good‑bad news is, a mass of neutronium could only get near us if it was more than a tenth of the Sun’s mass. Anything that heavy would make noticeable changes to planetary orbits long before we could see it. Bye.” <click>

~ Rich Olcott

Rugged asteroid surrounded by glowing debris in a colorful nebula

Neutral Under Pressure

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, Crazy Theories, Physics, UncategorizedLeave a comment

The Acme Building’s elevator takes me to the 12th floor with no hiccups, for a change. I unlock my office door and there’s “Walt,” standing in the middle of the room brandishing his cane with what looks like a fat cell phone plugged into it somehow. “The place is clean, Mr Moire. No listeners in the elevator shaft, corridor or office space, and I put temporary foam over your windows to block laser‑bounce sound pickup.”

“That’s good to know, Walt. Should I give you credit for fixing the elevator?”

“Not publicly. Found a dark web relay routine freeloading elevator’s controller computer. Disabled it so the machine can do its real job.”

“Nice work. But why so surreptitious? You know I don’t do military consults. And why come up to my office instead of meeting at Eddie‘s or the park as usual?”

“Tradecraft, Mr Moire — never use the same location too often. Espionage is a thing, military or not, and it doesn’t recognize national boundaries. My people have their secrets, too.”

“Naturally. What are your people curious about this time?”

“Neutronium.”

“Neutronium?”

“Yes, what can you tell me about it?”

“It’s really dense. You’ve heard the line that atoms are mostly empty space. An atomic nucleus is maybe a few femtometers across, but it floats in a ball of space that’s a thousand to ten thousand times wider. The space isn’t empty, of course — it’s occupied by spread‑out electronic charge. Neutronium doesn’t have that not‑quite‑empty space. A neutronium ball with the Sun’s mass would be a dozen kilometers across.”

“Mashed‑together charge like a metal. Would neutronium be shiny?”

“Possibly. I’ve never seen any.”

“Are there neutronium ores you could mine for?”

“Not on Earth, guaranteed. Except for the noble metals like gold, ore atoms are isolated from each other, dispersed in minerals like oxides or sulfides. Neutronium by its nature would have to be in a massive isolated deposit.”

“By its nature?”

“An isolated neutron lives about 15 minutes before it spits out an electron and becomes a proton. A neutron near enough to another nuclear particle is stabilized by the weak nuclear force, but that’s ineffective beyond a few femtometers. Either a neutron’s in an atomic nucleus or it’s mashed up against other neutrons in neutronium or it’s dead.”

“How about a chunk of neutronium buried in one of these ultra‑dense asteroids I’ve read about, like 33 Polyhymnia, or 16 Psyche that we’ve sent a space mission to look at?”

“You have read up, haven’t you? Not even those two asteroids are dense enough to host more than a speck of neutronium. Asteroid mass and volume are separate measurements; you need both to figure mass‑per‑volume density. Each component is a challenging exercise in accurate observation. The first guesstimate for Polyhymnia was that it was more than 10 times denser than iron. That’s why you’ve heard of it. With better data now we think both Polyhymnia and Psyche are at about the density of iron. Higher than most but too low for neutronium by a factor of quintillions.”

“Where else could we go for neutronium?”

“This’ll take some background. The more massive the star, the bigger its diameter and the longer it lives, right?”

Walt gives me a suspicious eye. “You’re fudging, Mr Moire.”

“Nothing gets past you, Walt. More massive stars burn hotter. The heat bulges them out, as you’d expect. The fudge is they exhaust their fuel faster so they die sooner. When the fuel gives out and they go nova, big guys collapse harder than smaller ones can. Their collapse squeezes their residual core tighter. Collapsing a really big star crams its remains into a volume smaller than its Schwartzschild radius. That makes a black hole. Smaller stars can’t go that far. The crush might stop when the residue’s electrons are squeezed into its atomic nuclei. Protons there could capture them and become neutrons. If so, you’ve got neutronium and a neutron star.”

“A nova’s pretty violent, shoots material out randomly?”

“One of the sloppiest, most violent events in the Universe.”

“Could a nova have flung a neutronium fragment through our Solar System like something flung ‘Oumuamua? Could we detect that?”

“Not likely but probably.”

Rugged asteroid surrounded by glowing debris in a colorful nebula

~ Rich Olcott

Why A Disk?

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, Cosmology, UncategorizedLeave a comment

Late Summer is quiet time on campus and in my office. Too quiet. I head over to Cal’s coffee shop in search of company. “Morning, Cal.”

“Morning, Sy. Sure am glad to see you. There’s no‑one else around.”

“So I see. No scones in the rack?”

“Not enough traffic yet to justify firing up the oven on such a hot day. How about a biscotti instead?”

“If it’s only the one it’s a biscotto. Pizza Eddie’s very firm on that. Yeah, I’ll have one.”

“Always learning. By the way, a photo spread in one of my astronomy magazines got me thinking. How come there’s so much flat out there?”

“Huh? I know you’re not one of those flat‑Earthers.”

“Not the planets, I mean the way their orbits go all in the same plane. Same for most of the asteroids and the Kuiper belt, even. Our Milky Way galaxy’s basically flat, too, and so are a lot of the others. Black hole accretion disks are flat. You’d think if some baby star or galaxy was attracting stuff from everywhere to grow itself, the incoming would make a big globe. But it’s not, we get flatness. How come?”

“Bad aim and angular momentum.”

“What’s aim got to do with it?”

“Suppose there’s only two objects in the Universe and they’re closing in on each other. If they’re aimed dead‑center to each other, what happens?”

“CaaaRUNCH!!!”

“Right. Now what if the aim’s off so they don’t quite touch?”

“Oh, I know that one … it’ll come to me … yeah, Roche’s limit, it was in an article a few months ago. Whichever’s less dense will break up and all the pieces go like Saturn’s rings. Which are also flat, by the way.”

“In orbit around the survivor, mm‑hm. The pieces can’t fall straight down because they still have angular momentum.”

“I know about momentum like when you crash a car if you go too fast for your brakes. Heavier car or faster speed, you get a worse crash. How does angle fit into that — bigger angle, more angular momentum?”

“Not quite. In general, momentum is mass multiplied by speed. It’s a measure of the force required to stop something or at least slow it down. You’ve described linear momentum, where ‘speed’ is straight‑line distance per time. If you’re moving along a curve, ‘speed’ is arc‑length per time.”

“Arc‑length?”

“Distance around part of a circle. Arc‑length is angle in radians, multiplied by the circle’s radius. If you zip halfway around a big circle in the same time it took me to go halfway around a small circle, you’ve got more angular momentum than I do and it’d take more force to stop you. Make sense?”

“What if it’s not a circle? The planet orbits are all ellipses.”

“It’s still arc‑length except that you need calculus to figure it. That’s why Newton and Leibniz invented their methods. A falling something that misses a gravity center keeps falling but on an orbit. Whatever momentum it has acts as angular momentum relative to that center. There’s no falling any further in without banging into something else coming the other way and each object canceling the other’s momentum.”

“Or burning fuel if it’s a spaceship.”

“… Right. … So anyway, suppose you’ve got a star or something initially surrounded by a spherical cloud of space junk whirling around in all different orbits. What’s going to happen?”

“Lots of banging and momentum canceling until everything’s swirling more‑or‑less in the same direction and closer in than at come‑together time. But it’s still a ball.”

“Gravity’s not done. Think about northern debris. It’s attracted to the center, but it’s also attracted to the southern debris and vice-versa. They’ll meet midway and build a disk. The ball‑to‑disk collapse isn’t even opposed by angular momentum. Material at high latitudes, north and south, can lose gravitational potential energy by dropping straight in toward the equator and still be at the orbitally correct distance from the axis of rotation.”

“That’d work for stuff collecting around a planet, wouldn’t it?”

“It’d even work for stuff collecting around nothing, just a clump in a random density field. That may be how stars are born. Collapsing’s the hard part.”

~ Rich Olcott

Sharpening The Image

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, Astronomy: Techniques, UncategorizedLeave a comment

“One coffee, one latte and two scones, Cal. Next time is Cathleen’s turn. Hey, you’ve got a new poster behind the cash register. What are we looking at?”

“You like it, Sy? Built the file myself from pics in my astronomy magazines, used the Library’s large‑format printer for the frameable copy. Came out pretty well, didn’t it, Cathleen?”

“Mm‑hm. Sy, you should recognize the pebbly-looking one. It’s granules at the bottom of the Sun’s atmosphere. The image came from the Inouye Solar Telescope at Haleakala Observatory on Maui, probably Earth’s best ground‑based facility for studying the Sun. I showed the image to your niece in that phone call. For scale, those granules of super‑heated rising gas are each about the size of Texas.”

“My magazine article didn’t mention Texas but it said there’s about ten million granules. What it was mostly about was the IST and its resolution. Those edges in the picture are as narrow as 18 miles across. It’s that good ’cause the beast has a 4‑meter mirror, which used to be amazing, but they made it even better with active and adaptive optics.”

“Hmm. It’s obvious that the bigger the mirror, the better it is for catching photons. If someone’s going to build a big mirror they’re going to put it behind a big aperture, which is important for resolving points that are close together. But what are ‘active and adaptive optics’ and why did you say that like they’re two different things?”

” ‘Cause they are two different things, Sy. Different jobs, different time‑scales. Gravity here on Earth can make a big mirror sag, and the sag changes depending on where the machine is pointed and maybe part of it gets the wrong temperature. Active optics is about keeping the whole mirror in the right shape to focus the photons where they’re supposed to go. There’s a bunch of actuators rigged up to give adjustable support at different points behind the mirror. The astronomer tells the system to watch a certain guide point and there’s a computer that directs each actuator’s pushing to sharpen the point’s image.”

“And adaptive optics?”

“That’s about solving a different problem. Stars twinkle, right, and the reason they twinkle is because of the atmosphere. One part refracts light one way, another part maybe warmer or with different humidity sends the light another way. Everything moves second to second. By the time a light‑wave gets down to us it’s been jiggled a lot. Adaptive optics is a small mirror, also with a lot of actuators, placed up in the light path after the primary mirror. Again with a guide point and a computer, the little mirror’s job is to cancel the jiggles so the scope’s sensors see a smooth wave. Adaptive works a lot faster than active, which sounds backwards, but I guess active came first.”

“The granules must be in the Sun’s disk somewhere. The other two images look like they’re on the edge.”

“That’s right, Sy. The bottom one is from the Solar Dynamic Observatory satellite a few years ago. That’s not visible light, it’s EUV—”

“EUV?”

“Extreme UltraViolet, light‑waves too short even for hydrogen so it’s mostly from iron atoms heated to millions of degrees. SDO had to be a satellite to catch that part of the spectrum because the atmosphere absorbs it. Of course, up there there’s no need for active or adaptive optics but imaging EUV has its own problems.”

“How tall is that photogenic tree?”

“It’s a prominence. The article said it’s about twenty times Earth’s diameter.”

“What about the pink one?”

“That’s new, Cathleen, from another Maui telescope. Adaptive optics were in play but there’s a problem. If you’re probing inside the corona there’s no fixed guide point. The team focused their adjustment system on corona features where they were a few seconds ago. The article said the process was ‘tricky,’ but look at the results. The loop is about the size of Earth, and those fine lines are about the width of Vancouver Island. They discovered details no‑one’s ever seen before.”

Top left: Schmidt et al./NJIT/NSO/AURA/NSF;
Top right: NSO/AURA/NSF under CC A4.0 Intl license;
Bottom: NASA/SDO

~ Rich Olcott

Snap The Whip

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, Physics: Electromagnetism, UncategorizedLeave a comment

“You say Alfven invented a whole science, Sy, but his double‑layer structures in plasma don’t look like much compared with the real ground‑breakers like Herschel or Hubble.”

“Your Astronomy bias is showing, Cathleen. The double‑layer thing was only a fraction what he gave to magnetohydrodynamics. To begin with, he dreamed up a new kind of wave.”

“There’s more than light waves, sound waves and ocean waves?”

“Certainly. There’s dozens of different kinds — look up waves in Wikipedia some day. Some move, some make other things move; sometimes things move in the direction the wave does, sometimes crosswise to it. From a Physics perspective waves are about repetition. Something that happens just once, where do you go from there?”

“That used to be Astronomy’s problem — only one solar system with fewer than a dozen planets, only two galaxies we could inspect closely. Now our space telescopes and monster‑mirror ground‑based observatories have given us thousands of planets and billions of stars and galaxies. If we get our classifications right we can follow an object type through every stage of development. It’s almost like watching Chemistry happen.”

“I doubt Susan Kim would agree but I get your point. Anyhow, most waves have a common underlying process. Many systems have an equilibrium condition. Doing something energetic like plucking on a guitar string moves the system away from equilibrium. That provokes some force to restore equilibrium. For the guitar, tension in the wire pulls it straight. Usually the restoration overshoots so the restoring force turns around to act in the opposite direction. That’s when the repetition starts, right?”

“Mm-hm, that’s sound waves in a nutshell. Ocean waves, too, because gravity’s the restoring force fighting with the wind to pull things flat.”

“Same idea. Well, Alfven’s first trick was to demonstrate that in a plasma or any conducting medium, a magnetic field acts like that guitar string. The field’s equilibrium configuration is straight and smooth. If you perturb the medium somehow to put a bend or kink in the field, magnetic tension kicks in to restore equilibrium. Waves restored by magnetic fields are important enough that they’re now called Alfven waves in his honor.”

“First trick, mmm? There’s more?”

“Yup, an old one he borrowed from Maxwell — the flux tube. Maxwell worked before atoms were a conceptual thing. He thought about magnetism in terms of immaterial ‘lines of force’ that followed the rules laid out in his equations. Think of grabbing a handful of barely cooked spaghetti, still mostly stiff.”

“Yuck.”

“You’re wearing gloves, okay? The point is, you’ve got a more‑or‑less cylindrical bundle of parallel strands. Pretend each strand is a line of magnetic force. Maxwell’s rules say the number of lines of force, the total magnetic flux, coming out one end of the bundle exactly equals the flux that went in the other end. There’s no sourcing or destroying magnetic flux in between.”

“What if I squeeze real hard?”

“Nope. The flux per unit area intensifies — that’s called ‘the pinch effect’ and particle beam folks love it — but the total flux stays the same. Here’s where it gets interesting. Alfven showed that if the flux tube passes through a plasma or other conducting medium, the medium’s charged particles get frozen into the field. Waggle the field, you waggle the particles. Now put that together with his waves.”

“Oh, that’s what those guys have been talking about! There’s a slew of recent papers built on observations from the Parker Solar Probe mission. One of the biggest outstanding problems in solar physics is, how can the corona, the outermost layer of the Sun’s atmosphere, be millions of degrees hotter than the 6000‑degree photosphere beneath it? Well, PSP and other satellite missions have recorded many observations where the ambient magnetic field suddenly flipped from one direction to its near‑opposite. It’s like the probe had flown through a flux tube zig‑zag in space.”

“Those sharp angles indicate a lot of pent‑up magnetic tension.”

“Absolutely! Now imagine those zig‑zags in the crowded chaos inside the Sun’s atmosphere, colliding, criss‑crossing, disconnecting, reconnecting, releasing their magnetic flux energy into frozen‑in particles that aren’t frozen any more. What do you get, Sy?”

“Immense amounts of kinetic energy. Hot times, indeed”

~ Rich Olcott

Old Sol And The Pasta Pot

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, UncategorizedLeave a comment

<chirp, chirp> “Excuse me, folks, it’s my niece. Hello, Teena.”

“Hi, Uncle Sy. What’s a kme?”

“Sorry, I don’t know that word. Spell it.”

“I’ve never seen it written down. Brian says the Sun’s specially active and gonna spit out a kme that’ll bang into Earth and knock us out of our orbit.”

“Ah, that’s a C‑M‑E, three separate letters. It stands for Coronal Mass Ejection. As usual, Brian’s got some of it right and much of it wrong. The right part is that the Sun’s at the peak of its 11‑year activity cycle so there’s lots of sunspots and flares—”

“He said flares, too. They’re super bright and could cook an Astronaut and it’d happen so fast we won’t have any warning.”

“Once again, partially right but mostly wrong. Here, let me give you to Cathleen who can set you straight. Cathleen, did you catch the conversation’s drift?”

<phone‑pass pause> “Hello, Teena. I gather you’re upset about solar activity?”

“Hi, Dr O’Meara. Yes, my sorta‑friend Brian likes to scare me with what he brings back from going down YouTube rabbit holes. I don’t really believe him but. You know?”

“I understand. Rabbit holes do tend to collect rubbish. Here, let me send you a diagram I use in my classes.” <another pause> “Did you get that?”

“Mm‑hm. Brian showed me a picture like that without the cut‑out part because he was all about the bright flashes.”

“Of course he was. I’ll skip the details, but the idea is that the Sun generates its heat and light energy deep in the reaction zone. Various processes carry that energy up through other zones until it hits the Sun’s atmosphere. You’ve watched water boil on the stove, surely.”

“Oh, yes. Mom put me in charge of doing the pasta last year. I don’t care what they say, a watched pot does eventually boil if there’s enough heat underneath it. I experimented.”

“Wonderful. That process, heat rising into a fluid layer, works the same way on the Sun as it does in your pasta pot. Heat ascends through the fluid but it doesn’t do that uniformly. No, the continuous fluid separates into distinct cells, they’re called Bénard cells, where hot fluid comes up the center, spreads out and cools across the top and then flows down the cell’s outer boundary.”

“That’s what I see happen in the pot with low water and low heat just before the bubbling starts.”

High-res image of the Sun’s surface by DKIST.
Credit: NSO/AURA/NSF, under CC A4.0 Intl license.

“Right, bubbling will disturb what had been a stable pattern. The cells in the Sun’s surface, they’re called granules, continually rise up to the surface and crowd out neighbors that have cooled off enough to sink or disappear.”

“Funny to say something on the Sun is cool.”

“Relatively cool, only 4000K compared to 6000K. But the Sun has bubbles, too. The granules run about 1500 kilometers wide and last only a quarter‑hour. There’s evidence they’re in top of a supporting layer of supergranules 20 times wider. Or maybe the plasma’s magnetic field is patchy. Anyhow, the surface motion is chaotic. Occasionally, especially concentrated heat or magnetic structure punches out between the granules. There’s a sudden huge release of superhot plasma, a blast of electromagnetic energy radiating out at all frequencies — that’s one of Brian’s flares. Lasts about as long as the granules.”

“That’s what could cook an astronaut?”

“Not really, The radiation’s pretty spread out by the time it’s travelled 150 million kilometers to us. The real danger is from high‑energy particle storms that travel along the Sun’s magnetic field lines. Space crews need to take shelter from them but particle masses travel slower than light so there’s several hours notice.”

“So what about the CMEs?”

“They’re big bubbles of plasma mass that the Sun throws off a few times a year on average. Maybe they come from ultra‑flares but we just don’t know. Their charged particles and magnetic fields can mess up our electronic stuff, but don’t worry about their mass. If a CME’s entire mass hit us straight on, it’d be only a millionth of a millionth of Earth’s mass. We’d roll on just fine.”

~ Rich Olcott

The Road to Gold

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, UncategorizedLeave a comment

Cathleen and Susan share a look.
 ”A conclusion way too far, Kareem.”
  ”Yep, you’ve overbounded your steps.”

Kareem tosses in a couple of chips. “Huh? What did I skip over? Where?”

Cathleen sees his bet and raises. “When you said that the Psyche asteroid’s gold content would be similar to what we dig up on Earth, you skipped many orders of magnitude in applying the Cosmological Principle.”

“I didn’t realize I’d done that. What’s the Cosmological Principle?”

“There’s several ways to state it, but they boil down to, ‘We’re not special in the Universe.‘ We think that fundamental constants and physical laws determined here on Earth have the same values and work the same way everywhere. Astrophysics just wouldn’t work as well as it does if the electron charge or Newton’s Laws of Motion were different a million lightyears away from us.”

“Wait, what about that galaxy that’s going to collide with us even though everything’s supposed to be flying away?”

“Fair question. The un‑boiled Principle includes some qualification clauses, especially the one that says, ‘when averaged over a large enough volume.’ How big a volume depends on what you’re studying. For motions of galaxies and such you have to average over a couple hundred million lightyears. Physical constants measured locally seem to be good out to the edge of the Observable Universe. Elemental abundances are somewhere in‑between — the very oldest, farthest‑away galaxies have less of the heavy stuff than we do around here. <pulls her tablet from her purse> Which brings me to this chart I built for one of my classes.”

“You’re going to have to explain that.”

“Sure. Both graphs are about element abundance. We get the numbers from stellar and galactic spectra so we’re averaging the local Universe out to a few hundred thousand lightyears. Left‑to‑right we’ve got hydrogen, helium, lithium and so on out to uranium in the big graph, out to iron in the small one. Up‑and‑down we’ve got atom count for each element, divided by the number of iron atoms so iron scores at 1.0. The range is huge, 31 000 hydrogens per single iron atom, all the way down to 17 rhenium atoms per billion irons. I needed this logarithmic scale to make the points I wanted to make in class.”

Vinnie sweetens the pot. “You’ve got that nice zig‑zag going in the little graph, Cathleen, but things get weird around iron and the big graph has that near‑constant series starting around 60. Why the differences?”

<lays down Q‑J‑10‑9‑8, all hearts, pulls in the chips> “Perfect straight line, Vinnie. The different behaviors come from nuclear cookery at different stages of a star’s life. Most new‑born stars start by fusing hydrogen nuclei, protons, to produce helium nuclei, alpha particles. Those two swamp everything else. As the star evolves to higher temperatures, proton‑addition processes generate successively more massive nuclei. Carbon starts a new pattern, because alpha‑addition processes it initiates generate the sawtooth pattern you picked up on — an alpha has two protons so each alpha fusion contributes to the atomic number peak two units along the line.”

“What happens with iron?”

“What happens when you put a blow torch to a red‑hot metal ball?”

“The ball melts.”

“Why?”

“Cause the extra energy’s too much for what holds the ball together.”

“Well, there you go. The forces that hold an atomic nucleus together have their limits, too. Iron and its next‑but‑one neighbor nickel are right on the edge of stability for alpha reactions. The alpha process in the core of a normal star can’t make anything heavier.”

“So how do we get the heavy guys?”

“Novas, supernovas and beyond. Those events are so energetic and so chaotic there’s non‑zero probability for any kind of atom to form and evolve to something stable before it can break down. Massive atoms just have a lower probability so there’s less of them when things settle down. Gold, for instance, at only 330 atoms per billion atoms of iron. The explosions spray heavy atoms throughout their neighborhood.”

Kareem antes the next pot. “So you’re saying my mistake was to assume that asteroid Psyche’s composition would match whole‑Universe heavy‑element statistics?”

“Well, that was his first mistake, right, Susan?”

~~ Rich Olcott

SPLASH Splish plink

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, Physics: Black Holes and Relativity, UncategorizedLeave a comment

<chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp> “Moire here. This’d better be good.”

“Hello, Mr Moire. I’m one of your readers.”

“Do you have any idea what time it is?”

“Afraid not, I don’t know what time zone you’re in.”

“It’s three o’clock in the morning! Why are you calling me at this hour?”

“Oh, sorry, it’s mid-afternoon here. Modern communications tech is such a marvel. No matter, you’re awake so here’s my question. I’ve been pondering that micro black hole you’ve featured in the last couple of posts. You convinced me it would have a hard time hitting Earth but then I started thinking about it hitting the Sun. The Sun’s diameter is 100 times Earth’s so it presents 10,000 times more target area, yes? Further, the Sun’s 300,000 times more massive than Earth so it has that much more gravity. Surely the Sun is a more effective black hole attractor than Earth is.”

“That’s a statement, not a question. Worse yet, you’re comparing negligible to extremely negligible and neither one is worth losing sleep over which is what I’m doing now.”

“Wait on, I’ve not gotten to my question yet which is, suppose a black hole did happen to collide with the Sun. What would happen then?”

<yawn> “Depends on the size of the black hole. If it’s supermassive, up in the billion‑sun range, it wouldn’t hit the Sun. Instead, the Sun would hit the black hole but there’d be no collision. The Sun would just sink quietly through the Event Horizon.”

“Wouldn’t it rip apart?”

“You’re thinking of those artistic paintings showing great blobs of material being torn away by a black hole’s gravity. Doesn’t work that way, at least not at this size range.” <grabbing Old Reliable from my nightstand and key‑tapping> “Gravitational forces are distance‑dependent. Supermassives are large even by astronomical standards. The M87* black hole, the first one ESA got an image of, has the mass of 6 billion Suns and an Event Horizon three times wider than Pluto’s orbit. The tidal ripping‑apart you’re looking for only happens when the mass centers of two objects approach within Roche’s limit. Suppose a Sun‑sized star flew into M87*’s Event Horizon. Their Roche limit would be 100 astronomical units inside the Event Horizon. If any ripping happened, no evidence could escape to us.”

“Another illusion punctured.”

“Don’t give up hope. The next‑smaller size category have masses near our Sun’s. The Event Horizon of a 10‑solar‑mass black hole would be only about 60 kilometers wide. The Roche Zone for an approaching Sun is a million times wider. There’s plenty of opportunity for ferocious ripping on the way in.”

“Somehow that’s a comfort, but my question was about even smaller black holes — micro‑size flyspecks such as you wrote about. What effect would one have on the Sun?”

“You’d think it’d be a simple matter of the micro‑hole, let’s call it Mikey, diving straight to the Sun’s center while gobbling Sun‑stuff in a gluttonous frenzy, getting exponentially bigger and more voracious every second until the Sun implodes. Almost none of that would happen. The Sun’s an incredibly violent place. On initial approach Mikey’d be met with powerful, rapidly moving magnetic fields. If he’s carrying any charge at all they’d give him whip‑crack rides all around the Sun’s mostly‑vacuum outer layers. He might not ever escape down to the Convection Zone.”

“He’d dive if he escaped there or he’s electrically neutral.”

“Mostly not. The Convection Zone’s 200,000-kilometer depth takes up two‑thirds of the Sun’s volume and features hyper‑hurricane winds roaring upward, downward and occasionally sideward. Mikey would be a very small boat in a very big forever storm.”

“But surely Mikey’s density would carry him through to the core.”

“Nope, the deeper you go, the smaller the influence of gravity. Newton proved that inside a massive spherical shell, the net gravitational pull on any small object is zero. At the Sun’s core it’s all pressure, no gravity.”

“Then the pressure will force‑feed mass into Mikey.”

“Not so much. Mikey has jets and and an accretion disk. Their outward radiation pressure sets an upper limit on Mikey’s gobbling speed. The Sun will nova naturally before Mikey has any effect.”

“No worries then.”

~~ Rich Olcott

Stars Are REALLY Warm-hearted

On By rolcottIn Astronomy: Stellar Science, UncategorizedLeave a comment

“I don’t understand, profesora. The Sun’s fuel is hydrogen. The books say when the Sun runs out of fuel it will eject much hydrogen and collapse to a white dwarf. So it didn’t run out of fuel, yes?”

“That’s an excellent question, Maria. Your simple sketch of layered zones is adequate for a stable star like our Sun is now. When things go unstable we need to pay more attention to dynamic details like mass, pressure and diffusion. The numbers matter.”

“I had that the fusion zone is 30% up from the center, and the top of the radiation zone is at 70%.”

“Yes, but percentages of a straight line don’t really give us a feel for the volumes and masses. Volumes grow as the radius cubed. The Sun’s core, the part inside your 30% radius, holds (30%)3 which is less than 3% of the Sun’s volume. The convection shell on the outside is also 30% thick, but that zone accounts for ⅔ of the star’s volume.”

“But not ⅔ of the mass, I think. The core is the most dense, yes?”

“Truly. The core is <chuckle> at the core of the matter. It’s obviously under compression from all the mass above it, but there’s a subtler and more important reason. The Sun’s internal temperatures are so high that everything acts like an ideal gas, even near the center. Once you’re beneath the convection zone, the only transport mechanism is diffusion influenced by gravity. Helium nuclei weigh four times what hydrogen nuclei do. Helium and heavier things tend to sink toward the center, hydrogen tends to float upward. What effect does that have on the core’s composition?”

“The core is heavy with much helium, not as much hydrogen.”

“Good. Now, what’s next above the core?”

“The fusion zo– Oh! The place where there’s enough hydrogen to do the fusing.”

“If the temperature and pressure are right. That turns out to be a delicate balance. Too much heat makes that region expand, average distance between atoms increases and that slows down the fusion reaction. Too much pressure slows diffusion which then slows the reaction by hindering hydrogen’s entry and helium’s exit. Too little heat or too little pressure do the opposite. Now you know why the fusion zone is so narrow in our diagrams, only about 10% of a radius.”

“No fusion in the other layers?”

“Less than 1% of the total. So we’ve got nearly all the heat in the star coming from hydrogen‑to‑helium fusion in this diffusion‑controlled gaseous reaction zone buried deep in the star.”

“Ah! Now I see. It is wrong to say the star dies because it runs out of fuel. There is still much hydrogen in the upper zones, but the diffusion doesn’t let enough enter the fusion zone. That is why the fire goes out. What happens then?”

“It mostly depends on the star’s mass. Really big ones have a sequence of deeper, hotter fusion layers in their core, forming heavier and heavier atoms all the way down to iron. Each layer is diffusion‑limited, of course, and the whole thing is like a stack of Jenga blocks supported by heat coming from below. If reaction in any layer overruns its fuel delivery then it stops producing heat. The whole stack collapses violently to form a neutron star or a black hole. Nearby infalling atoms collide and radiate in an exponential heat‑up. But the stars are many millions of kilometers across. The outermost layers don’t have time to fall all the way in. Their imploding gases slam into gases exploding from the collapse zone — BLOOEY! — there’s a nova spewing hydrogen and stardust across the Universe.”

“That is how our Sun will die?”

“No, it’s too small for such violence so it’s fated for a gentler old age. Five billion years from now its core will be mostly carbon and oxygen. Fuel delivery won’t be able to sustain further fusion reactions. The radiation and convection layers will simply settle inward, releasing enough gravitational potential energy to start hydrogen fusion in an expanding cool red shell outside the core.”

“Hee-hee — no lo va la nova, profesora, the nova doesn’t go.“

  • Thanks to Victoria, who asked the question.

~~ Rich Olcott